The alleged suicide of murder suspect P. Ramkumar in the high-security Puzhal Central Prison in Chennai has given rise to many questions and doubts. The claim that Ramkumar, the alleged lone assailant who stalked and killed young Swathi, took his own life by biting a live wire pulled out from a switchboard inside the prison is unusual. His lawyer alleges he was murdered. Even without questioning the suicide theory, it is clear that the prison administration has much to answer for. Ramkumar had suicidal tendencies, going by the police claim that he tried to slash his own throat when he was about to be arrested. Prison authorities say he was indeed under continuous watch by warders, and that he had been given psychological counselling. More ought to have been done to prevent the incident, as the case had become unusually sensitive, with the public debate assuming strong caste and communal overtones. It is surprising that the closely watched suspect had easy access, at a moment when he was conveniently alone, to a switchboard near the prison dispensary. It also so happened that the CCTV cameras installed in the modern prison did not cover that particular area where he chose to end his life. If he did commit suicide, there has been undoubted lapse in monitoring his movements. Prison suicides set off questions about the conditions of incarceration in our jails, often seen as overcrowded and understaffed. Suicide by electrocution is rare, as it is not difficult to deny prisoners any form of access to live electrical cables. There is truth in the theory that it is difficult to prevent a person determined to commit suicide, even if some correctional psychologists disagree. There ought to be an initial evaluation of incoming prisoners to identify those with a high risk of suicide.